Every project is taken apart with the same seven questions, each borrowed from a standard analysis tool, so you can compare this one with any other on the board. The funnel numbers come from the daily snapshots, not from the creator.
Post views, 30 days
15.8M
public view counts of tracked posts
→
Website visits (creator-provided)
77k
0.5 percent of impressions
→
Revenue, 30 days
$0
$0.00 per visit · $0 per 1,000 impressions
1
What is exchanged
Value Proposition CanvasMakers of developer tools pay $2,500 for 30 days in a side column of a directory with more than 300,000 views a month. They buy attention from people evaluating tools. One sponsor reported about 300 visits and zero sales from it.
2
How the price forms
Pricing mechanism analysisDemand set the price: $299 for the first slot, $1,199 for the tenth August slot, $2,500 for September. Renewals keep their old price, there is no auto-renewal, and a declined sponsor gets a full refund.
3
Supply and scarcity
Scarcity and inventory analysisTen slots, no rotation, no sharing. August sold out; seven of ten September slots were open on 28 August. The scarcity is real and it is what moved the price.
4
Growth loop
Viral loop analysisThe directory itself brings the traffic (1,093 apps, 407,116 page views in a month). Sponsors do not bring visitors; they buy the ones already there. Sponsors asked for slots before a sponsor page existed.
5
Defensibility
Moat and clone analysisThe traffic and the head start on a specific question. A copy would need the same audience first, and the audience came from the content, not from the sponsorship.
6
What can kill it
Failure mode analysisSponsor results. Simon Høiberg's zero sales from 300 visits is the kind of number that ends renewals. Traffic after a launch spike tends to fall, and $2,500 has a ceiling.
7
Why it works here
Editorial verdictAudience first, then ten scarce slots. The price is downstream of the traffic; the weak point is what the sponsors get for it.